|
Begin Block Quote: Although I agree it is a sad day to see a driver modder get punished for helping people, I think it is unfair to "bash" Creative on this. For a few reasons. 1) The licence agreement which we all accept to says that we must not reverse engineer or tamper with the software as it is the property of Creative Labs. 2) I firmly believe that Daniel K has caught the flack because of the Dolby Digital feature As far as I am aware Auzentech paid a lot of money for an exclusive licence with Dolby to have their cards support this. Now, Creative would get into trouble if they allow a means for this to be "cracked" to run on non-Auzentech cards. 3) Accepting money (even in the form of donations) for someone elses copyrighted material is a big NO NO. As for the whole driver XP vs Vista debate. Begin Retaliatory Remarks: >> Tamper, is being used in it's broadest sense to penalize the endeavours of an individual. The strongest synonym for tamper is interfere, and it's predominant meaning is, as quoted from dictionary.com, to meddle, esp. for the purpose of altering, damaging, or misusing (usually fol. by with): Someone has been tampering with the lock. Now, if the lock will not secure the bicycle it is not tampering (in it's most linear/logical sense) to fix the cylinder so that the bicycle is secured. However, if the lock is good, it is tampering to drill it out and steal the bicycle. Of course, in it's broadest sense, the word tamper does in fact prohibit the single-sided endeavour to accomplish a greater good. 2) Licensing agreements are not universal in nature. If I ebay an item and have it shipped to another country, that does not respect licensing agreements or patents, then I should be free to install any third party software I so choose, understanding that I inherit all risks of using unsupported third party products (No, IANAL) 3) The nature of donations is not to pay for a work. I do not give to church because they gave a sermon. I give out of a desire to support a mission. Similarly, if someone puts a jar on a counter at a gas station, I do not give money in the jar and expect my beer to be discounted (pick whatever is closest to your natural personality). A donation is not explicitly or implicitly tied to any particular deed, it is an unsolicited gift to support an individual or organization with which you deem appropriate. You can not say "Hey don't give money to the cripple, because he might qualify for a make-a-wish foundation field trip before he dies and [our institution] prohibits any such effort to give money to his cause. It's been more than 5 years since I bought a creative product, and if not for this disgusting and tasteless thread involving creative shirking and screwing someone genuinely interested in helping make it's hardware work I wouldn't have even bothered registering on this board. Kudos to you indie-programmer. Hope you don't get sent to jail or have your pooter stolen by creative, but just in case I recommend wiping all your source code and just sending out an email that says "dear users: creative says I need to go kill myself or get sued. So I am going to cease and decist" or something along those lines. -Maz On a personal note, I went through something very similar with VAIO. If I license your hardware, then upgrade a third party component (ie: the windows operating system) your license does not prohibit me from continuing to use the hardware to which I own a legitimate license. It might prohibit me from sharing the information, but like sony, if [insert company name] gets **bleep** retentive regarding my rights to use the product I purchase with my own money, then I simply refuse further dealings with said company. You've made my list, for all of the maybe 100-500$ you might would have sucked out of me over the next 2 decades creative.
|